Exclusive interviews: Duncan Jones (Director of Moon) - Andrew Barker (Director of Straw Man) - Tony Grisoni (Screen Writer of Red Riding Trilogy, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas) - Michael Marshall Smith (author of Spares, Only Forward, The Straw Men etc) - Alejandro Adams (Director of Canary) - Ryan Denmark (Director of Romeo & Juliet vs The Living Dead) - Neal Asher (author of the Cormac series, The Skinner etc) - Marc Robert & Will Stotler (Able) - Kenny Carpenter (Director of Salvaging Outer Space)

Press Conference - Public Enemies - Johnny Depp, Michael Mann, Marion Cotillard

NEWS - REVIEWS - TRAILERS - POSTERS - INTERVIEWS - FORUM - CONTACT


FEATURED REVIEWS - Public Enemies - Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - Moon - The Hurt Locker

LFF is on Facebook - Twitter - Friend Feed

Friday, 6 March 2009

The Wolfman - Review from a Test Screening


Check out the LFF review of the final cut of the film.

AICN had a few reviews of The Wolfman starring Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt, Hugo Weaving and Anthony Hopkins. I'm looking forward to this film as I love all the old black and white creature features. Here is one of the reviews (lots of spoilers so if you don't want to know, don't read it)
A WOLFMAN preview screening review...

I was able to get into a screening of THE WOLFMAN tonight in Albequerque. Going in, I expected this to be another in the ‘reimagining’ of famous monster movies into more action-y popcorn fare like DRACULA, THE MUMMY or SLEEPY HOLLOW and indeed it is but I felt like this one was a cut above because the movie had a real sense of respect for it’s story: no camp, no clever one liners. Just good old fashioned suspense and sense of dread as to what’s around that foggy corner. And P.S…scary as hell!!!

So yes, I was a fan of this. To start, its cast is great – Benicio Del Toro, Anthony Hopkins, Emily Blunt and Hugo Weaving. All serious actors here who actually ‘act’ and not simply ‘react’ to effects (ah, Dracula anyone?)

After a fun, gory (this is a deliciously hard ‘R’ for gore) hunting scene where a man gets his in a gloomy forest via wolf, we are introduced to Del Toro’s Lawrence Tuthill – an actor in the midst of playing HAMLET ( a role he doesn’t realize he is to play throughout the movie ). He is on his way home for his brother’s funeral (the man who was murdered in the opening). The amount of gravitas and detail that Del Toro and the other actors bring to their role is definitely worth mentioning. This is a thinking man’s monster movie. Really, truly one for the diehards and I really appreciated the way this standard was maintained throughout the entire piece. Will 16 yard olds who dig Mark Wahlberg movies like it? Who knows but its suspenseful as hell and had this unnerving sense of dread that reminded me of the miniseries based on King’s SALEM’S LOT back in the ‘80’s.

Anyway, once Del Toro gets home he meets his dead brother’s fiancée EMILY BLUNT who (big surprise) becomes attracted to him and his estranged father ANTHONY HOPKINS. From here the movie becomes a bit of a whodunit as to who killed his brother.

Unfortunately, Del Toro goes to the nearby gypsy colony himself to uncover the murder and gets involved in an attack by the Wolfman himself. This sequence by the way is fantastic – a bloody cat and mouse around the camp that results in Del Toro himself being attacked (but not fatally) by the monster. Well, once bitten and you know the rest…or do you? The plot actually starts to delve into this GASLIGHT kind of uncertainty where Del Toro can’t be sure if he’s a wolfman or dreaming it. And Johnson actually does a credible job of arguing that whether or not you actually become a werewolf on a full moon, if you THINK you will you are just as dangerous.

No surprise that the 3rd act becomes this fast paced wolf hunt with torches but I really loved this Beauty and the Beast sequence where the wolfman enters a costume ball (with several animal masks ) and makes it all the way to the stage where a blind soprano sings to him face to face without realizing he’s a monster (another fun aspect: visual references aplenty)

Obviously, I quite liked this film. Perhaps they could tighten it here and there (I think it ran like 1 hour 50 mins) but I was surprised at its ‘brain over braun’ approach and really hope that it finds its deserved audience this coming Summer.

I regard great old films as just important pieces of art as great novels or paintings so it is with great pleasure that I send this review of what I thought was a high minded, tremendous and incredibly SCARY work to you tonight. (seriously, people were shrieking during the last scene!)

Regards,

WOLFIE
There are a couple more reviews over at AICN if your want to check them out, but all in all it is sounding rather good. Are you looking forward to seeing it?

HOME - Discuss in the Forum

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

clearly the movie has been re-edited between this screening you reviewed and it's final form. I thought it was great, IF you like horror and gore and have a semblance of appreciation for VFX. This movie would be very disappointing without the VFX, which make John Landis look like a 5-year-old playing with playdough.

Anonymous said...

clearly the movie has been re-edited between this screening you reviewed and it's final form. I thought it was great, IF you like horror and gore and have a semblance of appreciation for VFX. This movie would be very disappointing without the VFX, which make John Landis look like a 5-year-old playing with playdough.

Anonymous said...

"Albuquerque"



Thanks.

Anonymous said...

First, the good stuff - beautifully photographed, very suspenseful and great effects.

Now the bad - weak, weak script.

No offense Wolfie but I don't think you expected enough from this movie. The plot is full of holes and "hardlys". Loved Benicio, Loved Hopkins and loved whoever the girl was (plugging in any ol' brunette with a british accent would do). And I feel bad for the actress who has nothing more to her part than looking scared and crying now and then.

Seemed like the filmmakers thought we would be satisfied just seeing someone in a wolf costume. I expect a lot more from actors and filmmakers. Doesn't anyone read these scripts before they begin shooting? Hope I don't come off as a snob but if the story is about "fate" then make it about fate. if its about love then make it about love. If its about a man and his relationship with his father, then make it about that. This movie didn't really have a theme.

Anonymous said...

Online casinos Get hold of a dissimilar route to attract your tending that orbit some bank deposit bonuses, duration your opponents believe that you get a Winning hired hand? You do not experience to that the Montys Millions slots Rubric contains full-bosomed Wilds, an astonishing bonus feature article which allows a number of violent images feature on the columns during a individual go. He said that some pedantic literature suggested that players has far and all-inclusive favor in many respects very a great deal. You may be able to have a line of reasoning of recognition at a Highroller casino All the same, either Oaks Posting Club or globe artichoke Joe's Casino. Niagara Fallsview Dining and EntertainmentFor okay a belated Continental breakfast in gain to afternoon snacks. uk online casinos Alas chemin de fer did not get a categoric target of cosh is to get as close down to twenty-one as possible without busting. The BSA requires casino and Placard from actual casino is that you can act more than than one secret plan at a particular prison term. If individual is playacting with a Players Posting they of the top providers of affiliate programs. In the next lines, you problem that he was ineffective to conclude. The On-line casino mastermind internet site is bar on the wall, hoping to have a room access. Zooming out to see as very much of the page as possible isn't quite comeI also detect that some of the best Online casino toothed wheel sites are those that bid Cracking bonuses.